<HTML>I think the date of the last update in 2004 says a lot. Cam drive engine designs are a dime a dozen (google dyna-cam for one possibly in production) plus I am always worried when a well known automotive figure attaches their name to a revolutionary automotive product, Jack Brabham and Splitcycle, Peter Brock and the Energy polariser as a couple of Australasian examples that turned to custard.
The lack of test results since they started in 1998 is also another worry.
Cheers
Mark Stacey</HTML>
<HTML>I think the date of the last update in 2004 says a lot. Cam drive engine designs are a dime a dozen (google dyna-cam for one possibly in production) plus I am always worried when a well known automotive figure attaches their name to a revolutionary automotive product, Jack Brabham and Splitcycle, Peter Brock and the Energy polariser as a couple of Australasian examples that turned to custard.
The lack of test results since they started in 1998 is also another worry.
Cheers
Mark Stacey</HTML>
<HTML>Dyna cam isn't in full production...10years 42 prototypes,later.They finally got approved by the FAA for aircraft engine usage.With initial orders being made for homebuilt aircraft guys.
Aviation diesels(mainly bi-turbo radial) are taking an unexpected bite out of Dyna Cam's targeted market share.
Rotec's gas radial has dampened some of Dyna Cam's plans ,as well.</HTML>
<HTML>Well, Jim I am not sure what you want to hear, I just saw this thing on the net and said to myself -- self that's a different engine! I wonder if the forum here had heard of it and what the consensus was on the technology and from what I have read so far, I guess not much. :-)</HTML>